When talking about a way to match media properties to some condition component uses word criterion.
Criteria are used when selecting audio quality, audio decoder, video quality, video downloader, subtitles to show initially, subtitles to use in Lyric Show Panel 3 source and internally in video frame context menu (qualities popup menu) and analysis cache UI.
Top level criteria internally reside in criteria repositories. Criteria combo boxes (for example
Decoding Playback quality) contain all criteria from single repo. In different cases are used different repos. So for example criteria in
Playback quality and non-playback quality (combo box next to
Override non-playback quality) are the same, but criteria from
Decoder combo box near to them are different.
When you select
Configure item from criteria combo box, a dialog box pops up where you can configure repository i.e. manage criteria within it.
This dialog box has list control with all criteria belonging to it. Use context menu of this list to explore available options.
Once you've added new criterion in order to use it, do not forget to select this criterion after you close repository configuration window. It is not selected automatically neither in this case nor when you remove from repository the criterion that is currently selected in this combo box.
To modify criterion, open criteria repository window, select criterion and use context menu item
Modify. Criteria configuration window will appear after that and you can start modification.
Main UI element of this window is a tree control containing criteria tree. All modification options are available there via context menu.
Basically each criterion consists of two parts: property to which it applies and condition for its compliance. And when two qualities are compared, a check is performed whether they match this condition, and if both match - which one matches it better.
Available properties to match are grouped next way (you can find them in popup menu
Add of tree context menu):
Origin- properties relevant not to single quality but to entire origin where this quality comes from. I.e. they are the same for all qualities within single origin but are different for different origins. Here reside metadata, origin URL (e.g. URL to video page), length (in seconds) and a flag whether this origin represents live stream
Container- properties of multimedia container format used for quality being matched. For example number of streams, size (if quality is represented by a single file), URL (to this specific media file or stream), bitrate (total bitrate of this file / stream) etc.
Video, Audio, Subtitles- properties of corresponding streams within the container
There are five types of criteria: numeric, textual, boolean, composite and include. Difference of first three ones comes from properties they match. For example container streams count is a number so it is covered by numeric criterion. Codec name is a string so criterion is textual. Whether container is HLS is a true/false flag so it is covered by boolean criterion. And so on.
Composite criteria are used to group other criteria and combine their results.
Criterion can have other criteria embedded in it via an include. This way can be avoided duplication of the same blocks within different criteria, or for example one criteria can be used as a fallback for another.
numeric criteria have their own set of conditions. Condition can be changed for selected criterion using context menu.
Composite criteria have two conditions. They specify how results of nested criteria should be combined.
AND means that quality matches composite criteria if it matches all nested criteria.
OR means that quality matches composite criteria if it matches at least one of nested criteria.
Conditions for numeric criteria are described in the following list. Note that when comparing two qualities using numeric criteria it checks not only if there is a match (aka yes/no) but which one matches better to sort qualities accordingly. Canonical number there is the number you specify when adjusting criteria.
is equal to- whether property value is exactly equal to canonical number
is the closest below- value should be less or equal to canonical number. Wins the one nearest to it
is the closest above- value should be greater or equal to canonical number. Wins the one nearest to it
has the maximum value,
has the minimum value- wins the one with maximum or minimum value respectively. Canonical number is not used in this case.
Canonical string for textual criteria is a string you specify when adjusting criteria. All conditions are case-insensitive. Supported conditions:
is equal to- canonical string should be equal to property value
contains- property value must contain canonical string
matches regex- canonical string is treated as regular expression. Criteria matches only if full property value matches specified regex. Partial match is not allowed. If you need a partial match, wrap your regex with
This criteria checks if particular flag is set in quality. These criteria do not have specific conditions.
This modifier inverts result of criteria matching. For property-based criteria it inverts result only if quality has such property. When comparing two qualities, it inverts result only if one quality better matches criteria than another (because comparison implies ordering, so internally there is no such comparison result as 'not equal', one quality may match criteria better than other, worse or the same).
When properties are matched using some condition, match is marked as failed if given quality does not contain the property being matched. In some cases this is not the desired behavior.
Suppose you want to select audio that has the maximum bitrate. If quality does not contain bitrate info, that is ok - you have other conditions in the chain like number of channels, sample rate etc. You want bitrate condition to be skipped if it cannot be checked. But behavior of numeric criterion is different: it marks whole chain as failed since there are no bitrate information.
Solution is to mark criteria as optional. This way criteria always match given quality. So the quality is not discarded before comparison. However after that, when comparing two qualities, wins the one that really has given property.
For numeric properties it does more than just dealing with nonexistent properties. If property exists, it makes condition to be considered as passed even if property value does not actually match condition. Qualities containing such properties will have lesser priority than ones that really match appropriate condition but greater than ones which do not have such properties at all. This way, for example, if you have condition
bitrate the closest below 128kbps and the only one quality with, say, 256kbps bitrate, it will not be rejected.
For complex criteria it is not always obvious why one or another quality wins or gets skipped. To help with this a way is provided to examine criteria work on fly while you are editing them.
Criteria configuration windows for repositories that support testing have additional button
Test which opens criteria test window.
Test UI uses analysis cache to get videos for test. It would report an error "There are no tracks in analysis cache" if no videos were opened before opening preferences page.
Criteria test window has combo box and list control. Combo box contains all tracks from analysis cache at the moment you opened preferences page. List control contains all separate streams found for the video selected in combo box.
List control visualizes how criteria from criteria configuration window matches available streams. Matching is performed on the fly after every change is made in configuration window.
If stream in the list is checked that means it matched the criteria. Streams are sorted according to the best match. So when selecting quality to play, will be used the one that is on top of this list (if it is checked, otherwise there will be an error saying that no qualities matched criteria).
Streams that are unchecked in the list are still sorted with meaning. Numeric criteria have extra logic applied to non-matching qualities. When comparing two such qualities, it checks which one was closer to match.
If you want to get more details why some stream matched or did not match criteria, select it in the list and use context menu item
Match. It will show detailed description how stream was matched to every single criteria until the final result was determined.
If you want to get details about why one stream was ranged better than other, select these two streams and use context menu item
Compare. As with the
Match, it will show detailed description how comparison was going through every single criteria until the final result was determined.